Analyse de l'indice d'enquête auprès des entreprises de l'économie sociale (S-BSI) : développement, caractéristiques et efficacité de l'élaboration et de l'évaluation des politiques de l'économie sociale
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser701Mots-clés :
Indice des enquêtes de conjoncture en économie sociale, économie sociale, création de valeur sociale et économique, efficacité des politiques, politiques publiques de la prochaine générationRésumé
Cette étude explore l’Indice des enquêtes de conjoncture en économie sociale, un outil conçu pour évaluer la valeur sociale et économique réalisée dans l’économie sociale afin d’obtenir un savoir qui pourrait s’avérer utile pour mener des interventions opportunes dans les politiques publiques. L’étude a pour but d’effectuer une analyse compréhensive de l’Indice en tenant compte de son développement, de ses caractéristiques distinctives et de son efficacité comme instrument avancé pour formuler et évaluer des politiques en économie sociale. La méthodologie employée comprend une analyse en profondeur du processus de développement de l’Indice, suivie de multiples analyses comparatives d’enquêtes semblables à l’échelle domestique et internationale. En outre, l’étude recourt à des techniques d’évaluation qualitative fondées sur un cadre « prochaine génération » pour formuler des politiques publiques en économie sociale. Cette approche de recherche à multiples facettes vise à inspirer une compréhension holistique de l’Indice, offrant des observations qui pourraient s’avérer utiles pour les décideurs et les bailleurs de fonds responsables de développer les politiques publiques en économie sociale.
Téléchargements
Références
Bouchard, M. J., & Rousselière, D. (2015). The weight of the social economy: An international perspective. Bruxelles: PIE Peter Lang.
Bouri, A., C. J. Fonzi, S. Gelfand, A. Gromis, K. Lankester, G. Leung, K. McCarthy, et al., (2011). Data Driven: A Performance Analysis for the Impact Investing Industry. New York: Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS), Global Impact Investing Network.
Bryson, J., G. Cunningham and K. Lokkesmoe., (2002), What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: The Case of Problem Formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota, Public Administration Review, 62, 5, 568–84.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Powers, C. W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., David, B., Duffy, L. K., Jewett, S. C., & Volz, C. D. (2005). Science, policy, and stakeholders: developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska, Environmental Management, 35, 557-568.
Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double Botom Line Project Report: Assessing Social Impact In Double Botom Line Ventures. Rockefeller Foundaton. Retrieved from htp://www.riseproject.org/DBL_Method_Catalog
Chaves, R. (2012). Las políticas públicas y las cooperativas. Ekonomiaz. Revista Vasca de Economía, 79, 168-199. (In Spanish)
Chaves, R. (2008). Las actividades de cobertura institucional: infraestructuras de apoyo y políticas de apoyo a la economía social. La Economía Social en España en el año, 565-592. (In Spanish)
Chaves, R. (Ed.). (2020). La nueva generación de políticas públicas de fomento de la economía social en España (The new generation of public policies to promote the social economy in Spain). Tirant lo Blanch. (In Spanish)
Cosa, M., & Urban, B. (2023). A systematic review of performance measurement systems and their relevance to social enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1-29.
Costa, E. and Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2014-0092
Defourny, J., 2001, From third sector to social enterprise. The emergence of social enterprise, London and New York, Routledge, 1-18
Demoustier, D., Draperi, J. F., Lambert, M., Fretel, A., Lethielleux, L., ... & Roger, B. (2020). Atlas commenté de l'économie sociale et solidaire. Observatoire national de l'économie sociale et solidaire (France). Juris éditions
Ebrahim, A. and Rangan, V.K. (2010). The limits of nonprofit impact: a contingency framework for measuring social performance, Working Paper 10-099, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
Enjolras, B. (2009). The public policy paradox. Normative foundations of social economy and public policies: Which consequences for evaluation strategies. The worth of the social economy: An international perspective, 43-62.
Emerson, J., Wachowicz, J. and Chun, S. (2000). Social return on investment: exploring aspects of value creation in the nonprofit sector. The Box Set: Social Purpose Enterprises and Venture Philanthropy in the New Millennium, The Roberts Foundation, San Francisco, CA.
Florman, M., Klinger-Vidra, R. and Facada, M.J. (2016). A critical evaluation of social impact assessment methodologies and a call to measure economic and social impact holistically through the external rate of return platform, Working Paper 160, London School of Economics Enterprise, London, pp. 1-32.
Gelper, S., Lemmens, A., & Croux, C. (2007). Consumer sentiment and consumer spending: decomposing the Granger causal relationship in the time domain. Applied Economics, 39(1), 1-11.
GIIN. (2011). Data Driven: A Performance Analysis for the Impact Investing Industry. In 2011 IRIS Data Report. New York, NY: Global Impact Investing Network. Accessed July 14, 2014. http://www.thegiin.org/binarydata/Data_Driven_IRIS
_report_final.pdf.
Golinelli, R., & Parigi, G. (2004). Consumer sentiment and economic activity: a cross country comparison. Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, 2004(2), 147-170.
Gugerty, M. K., & Karlan, D. (2018). Ten reasons not to measure impact–and what to do instead. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(3), 41-47.
Grieco, Cecilia. (2015). Assessing Social Impact of Social Enterprises: Does One Size Really Fit All? Springer Briefs in Business; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 978-3-319-15314-8.
Jung, J.R., Cho G.B., & Lee. B. R. (2020) Domestic and international case study on building a pool of social value indicators. Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency. (In Korean)
Kah, S., & Akenroye, T. (2020). Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: a systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(4), 381-402.
Killick, T. (1993). The adaptive economy: adjustment policies in small, low-income countries. World Bank Publications.
Kim, J. Y. (2022). A study of the development of the Business Survey Index for social economy enterprises. Social Economy & Policy Studies, 12(1). (In Korean)
Kim, J.Y. and Kim, J.S. (2021). Research on the development of business trend index (BSI) for social economy enterprises. KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency): Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency). Policy Research Team. (2019). Korea Social Economy. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. Available online: https://www.socialenterprise.or.kr/social/board/view.do?m_cd=F077&pg=1&board_code=BO04&category_id=CA06&category_sub_id=&com_certifi_num=&selectyear=&magazine=&title=&search_word=%ed%95%9c%ea%b5%ad%ec%9d%98+%ec%82%ac%ed%9a%8c%ec%a0%81%ea%b2%bd%ec%a0%9c&search_type=titl&seq_no=240840 (accessed on 14 December 2023)
KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency). (2022). The Social Economy Business Survey Index results for the second quarter of 2022. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. (In Korean) Available online: https://www.socialenterprise.
or.kr/social/board/view.do?pg=1&m_cd=D024&seq_no=248130&search_word=&search_type=&board_code=BO04&category_id=CA01&com_certifi_num=&selectyear=&magazine=&mode=view (accessed on 14 December 2023)
KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency). (2023). The Social Enterprise Business Survey Index results for the third quarter of 2023. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. (In Korean) Available online: https://www.socialenterprise.
or.kr/social/board/view.do?m_cd=D024&board_code=BO04&category_id=CA01&seq_no=250398&pg=&search_type=&search_word= (accessed on 14 December 2023)
Kroeger A., Weber C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review 39(4): 513–540.
Lab, B. (2013). What is a GIIRS Impact Rating. B Lab. Accessed August 27, 2013. http://giirs.org/about-giirs/how-giirs-works/159.
Laurisz, N. (2019). The role of stakeholders in development of social economy organizations in Poland: an integrative approach. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 74.
Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social impact measurement: Classification of methods. Environmental management accounting and supply chain management, 171-202.
Martínez, M.I., Castro, R.B, Alemán, D., Guilló, N. and De Diego, P. (2020). Análisis del impacto socioeconómico de los valores y principios de la Economía Social en España. CEPES. (In Spanish)
Martinos, H., Johnson, T., Tödtling-Schönhofer, H. (2020). The impact of social economy at the local and regional level, European Committee of the Regions, Commission for Social Policy, Education, Employment, Research and Culture, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2863/781060
Mojtahedi, M., & Oo, B. L. (2017). Critical attributes for proactive engagement of stakeholders in disaster risk management. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 21, 35-43.
Mulgan, G. (2010). Measuring social value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(3), 38-43.
Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision making, 6(8), 771-781.
Nie, M. (2004). State Wildlife Policy and Management: The Scope and Bias of Political Conflict. Public Administration Review, 64, 2, 221–33.
OECD (2017). Governing better through evidence-informed policy making. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/gov/governing-better-through-evidence-informed-policy-making-proceedings.pdf
Papineau, D. and M.C. Kiely. (1996). Participatory Evaluation in a Community Organization: Fostering Stakeholder Empowerment and Utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 1, 79–93.
Pathak, P., & Dattani, P., (2014). Social return on investment: three technical challenges. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 91-104.
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Taieb, S. B., ... & Ziel, F. (2022). Forecasting: theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), 705-871.
Porter, S., & Shortall, S. (2009). Stakeholders and perspectivism in qualitative policy evaluation: a realist reflection. Public Administration, 87(2), 259-273.
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 43(1), 82-115.
Seo, J. (2024) From boom to transformation: assessing the paradigm shift in public policies for the Social Economy in South Korea, Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2296627
Salazar, J. de J., Husted B. W., Biehl M. (2012). Thoughts on the evaluation of corporate social performance through projects. Journal of Business Ethics 105(2): 175–186.
Silva, V., Lima, V., Sá, J. C., Fonseca, L., & Santos, G. (2022). B impact assessment as a sustainable tool: Analysis of the certification model. Sustainability, 14(9), 5590.
United Nations. (2015). Handbook on economic tendency surveys. Stat Pap, 96, 1-158.
Utting, P. (2017). "Public policies for social and solidarity economy. Assessing Progress in Seven Countries." ILO/International Labour Office (ILO): Geneva, Switzerland.
Van Woensel, L., Evidence for policy-making Foresight-based scientific advice, European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament, April 2021. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690529/EPRS_BRI(2021)690529_EN.pdf
Vedung, E. (1997). Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K), Transaction Publishers, 36-39.
WEF (World Economic Forum). (2022). Unlocking the Social Economy Towards an inclusive and resilient society. Insight Report. World Economic Forum and Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship: New York, USA. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Unlocking_the_Social_Economy_
pdf (accessed on 14 December 2023)
Wood, C., & Leighton, D. (2010). Measuring social value: the gap between policy and practice. Undercurrent, (2), 7-9.
Yi, J. B., & Chun, S. H. (2022). The Effect of Cash Incentive Projects on the Social Value Performances of Social Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis of SK’s Social Progress Credit in Korea. Sustainability, 14(10), 6310.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Jiae Seo 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
La soumissions d’un manuscrit original à la Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l'économie sociale / Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research (ANSERJ) implique que le texte soit original et qu’il n'ait pas été publié ou soumis pour publication ailleurs.
La revue estime que la publication de la recherche scientifique a pour but de diffuser les connaissances, et ce dans un régime à but non lucratif qui ne bénéficie ni à l'éditeur ni à l'auteur sur le plan financier. La revue se donne la responsabilité, envers ses auteurs et la société en général, de rendre le contenu disponible en ligne étant donné que la technologie permet. Conformément à ce principe, la revue publiera tous ses numéros en ligne.
Les auteurs qui publient dans l'ANSERJ s'engagent à publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons, Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International (CC BY). Cette licence permet à quiconque de copier et de distribuer l'article à condition que l'attribution appropriée soit donnée. Pour plus de détails sur les droits qu'un auteur accorde aux utilisateurs de son travail, veuillez consulter le résumé de la licence et la licence complète.
[
Le contenu publié entre 2010 et 2019-10 est sous la « Licence de Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
Le contenu publié entre 2019-10 et 2023-12 est sous la « Licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
Le contenu publié après 2023-12 est sous la « Licence Creative Commons 4.0 International » (CC BY).]
