Collaboration between Canadian Grantmaking Foundations: The Expression of an Increasingly Ambitious and Strategic Philanthropic Sector?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2017v8n2a254Keywords:
Grantmaking foundations, Canada, collaboration, philanthropy / Fondations subventionnaires, philanthropieAbstract
This article critically discusses the practice of foundation collaboration in Canada and describes the context, vehicles, and forms that it takes. It is based on data from interviews with 23 key informants and a literature review of over 100 publications from grey and scholarly literature. Over the last decade, Canadian grantmaking foundations appear to be working together more often, motivated by goals of information sharing, coordination, impact, and risk mitigation. In Canada, as elsewhere, this growing practice is closely related to the trend toward strategic philanthropy, in which foundations position themselves as agents of change. The article raises cautions and criticisms about foundation collaboration, related to considerations of strategic and cultural fit as well as to existing challenges concerning philanthropy’s power and legitimacy in society.
L’article propose de faire un examen critique des pratiques de collaboration entre fondations subventionnaires au Canada, qui représentent un domaine jusqu’ici peu exploré dans la recherche scientifique. À partir d’entretiens avec 23 informateurs clés et une recension d’écrits scientifiques et non scientifiques, l’article décrit le contexte, les chemins d’émergence et les formes que prennent ces pratiques de collaboration. Au cours de la dernière décennie, les pratiques de collaboration entre fondations subventionnaires semblent afficher une progression au Canada. Des fondations participantes indiquent être motivées par le désir de soutenir le développement des connaissances, de mieux coordonner leurs efforts, d’accroitre l’efficacité ou l’impact de leurs interventions et d’en atténuer les risques. Au Canada comme ailleurs, le développement des pratiques de collaboration entre fondations est lié à l’influence du courant de la philanthropie « stratégique » qui incite les fondations à assumer une posture plus affirmée d’agent de changement. L’article partage également des réflexions critiques au sujet de ces pratiques. Entre autres, il arrive que les organisations participantes doivent composer avec des défis de compatibilité culturelle et stratégique. De plus, ces pratiques se confrontent à des débats existants concernant le pouvoir exercé par les fondations philanthropiques et leur légitimité en tant qu’acteurs sociaux.
Downloads
References
Anheier, H. K. and Leat, D. (2006). Creative philanthropy: Toward a new philanthropy for the 21st century. London, UK: Routledge.
Backer, T.E. (2004). Collaboration approaches for smaller foundations. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Bartczak, L. (2015). Building collaboration from the inside out. Washington, DC: Grantmakers for Effective Organizations.
Bartczak, L. and Scearce, L. (2012). Can philanthropy be networked and strategic? Alliance Magazine, 17(4). URL: http://www.alliancemagazine.org/feature/can-philanthropy-be-networked-and-strategic/
Bernholz, L., Fulton, K., and Kasper, G. (2005). On the brink of new promise: The future of U.S. community foundations. San Francisco: Blueprint Research & Design and The Monitor Group.
Berthiaume, A. and Lefèvre, S. (2016). Le collectif québécois des fondations sur les inégalités sociales. Une étude de cas exploratoire sur la collaboration de fondations québécoises. Working paper #11. Montreal: PhiLab.
Buchanan, P. (2016). Big issues, many questions: An essay on the pressing issues facing U.S. foundation leaders and boards.
Cambridge, MA: Center for Effective Philanthropy.
Buteau, E., Buchanan, P., and Brock, A. (2009). Essentials of foundation strategy. Cambridge, MA: Center for Effective Philanthropy.
Carson, E. (2012). Rethinking collective impact: Part two. Huffington Post. URL:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/emmett-d-carson/collective-impact-_b_1847972.html. [Posted May 09 2012].
Celep, A., Brenner, S., and Mosher-Williams, R. (2016). Internal culture, external impact: how a change-making culture positions foundations to achieve transformational change. The Foundation Review, 8(1), 116-129.
Coffman, J., Beer, T., Patrizi, P., and Thompson, E.H. (2013). Benchmarking evaluation in foundations: Do we know what we’re doing? The Foundation Review, 5(2), 36-51.
DP Evaluation (2012). A funder conundrum: Choices that funders face in bringing about positive social change. London, UK: Association of Charitable Foundations.
Dunsky Energy Consulting (2015). En route to a low-carbon future: A landscape assessment for Canadian grantmakers. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Grantmakers Network. URL: http://www.cegn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/EnRouteToALowCarbonFuture.pdf
Easterling, D. and Metz, A. (2016). Getting real with strategy: insights from implementation science. The Foundation Review, 8(2), 97-115.
Edwards, M. (2011). The role and limitations of philanthropy. Commissioned paper for the Bellagio Initiative. East Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies, The Resource Alliance & Rockefeller Foundation.
Elson, P. and Hall, S. (2016). System change agents: A profile of policy-focused grantmaking foundation engagement in public policy. ANSERJ, Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 7(2), 57-78.
Elson, P. and Hall, S. (2017). {article to appear in this ANSERJ edition; citation to add}
Fontan, J.-M. (2015). Place et rôle des fondations subventionnaires dans l’écosystème philanthropique. In Institut Mallet (Ed.), Écosystème philanthropique : perspectives, perceptions et échanges. Proceedings of the Sommet 2015 sur la culture philanthropique, Montréal (pp. 113-130). Québec: Institut Mallet.
Fulton, K., Kasper, G. and Kibbe, B. (2010). What’s next for philanthropy: Acting bigger and adapting better in a networked world. San Francisco: Monitor Institute.
Gair, C. (2013). Strategic co-Funding: An approach for expanded impact. San Francisco & Washington, DC: REDF & Grantmakers for Effective Organizations.
Gibson, C (2009). Funder collaboratives: Why and how funders work together. New York: GrantCraft (The Foundation Center).
Glass, J. (2016). The landscape of foundations collaborating in Canada. Working Paper #13. Montreal: PhiLab.
Graddy, E. A. and Morgan, D. L. (2006). Community foundations, organizational strategy, and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 605-630.
Grantmakers for Effective Organizations (2013). The promise and pitfalls of local and national funder collaborations: Lessons learned from the Social Innovation Fund. Scaling What Works Lessons Learned series. Washington, DC: Grantmakers for Effective Organizations.
Hamilton, R. (2002). Moving ideas and money: Issues and opportunities in funder funding collaboratives. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chapin Hall Center for Children.
Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-8.
Healy, J. and Donnelly-Cox, G. (2016). The evolving state relationship: implications of “Big Societies” and shrinking states. In Jung, T. Phillips, S.D. and Harrow, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy (pp. 200-212). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Huang, J. and Seldon, W. (2015). Lessons in funder collaboration: What the Packard Foundation has learned about working with other funders. Boston: Bridgespan Group.
Hughes, R. (2005). Philanthropies working together: Myths and realities. New York: The Foundation Center.
Imagine Canada and Philanthropic Foundations Canada (2014). Assets and Giving Trends of Canada’s Grantmaking Foundations. Ottawa and Montreal: Imagine Canada and Philanthropic Foundations Canada.
James, R. (2013). Funder collaboration: a compelling and cautionary tale. Praxis note no 64. Oxford, UK: INTRAC (International NGO Training and Praxis Centre).
Johnston, P. (2012). Good grantmaking: A guide for Canadian foundations. Montreal: Philanthropic Foundations Canada.
Jung, T. and Harrow, J. (2015). New development: Philanthropy in networked governance-– treading with care. Public Money and Management, 35(1), 47-52.
Kabel, C. (2016). Five lessons on successful philanthropic collaborations. Blog post. URL: http://effectivephilanthropy.org/five-lessons-on-successful-philanthropic-collaborations/
Kania, J. and Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter 2011, 36-41.
Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2013). Embracing emergence: How collective impact addresses complexity. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter 2013, 1-7.
Kania, J., M. Kramer and P. Russell (with responses) (2014). Strategic philanthropy for a complex world. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer 2014, 26-39.
Kaufmann, J. (2011). Funders in collaboration: A review of the Corston Independent Funders’ Coalition (CIFC). London, UK: Cass Business School of City University London.
Knight, B. and Hartnell, C. (2011). Reframing the collaboration debate. Alliance Magazine,16(1), 28-33.
Kramer, L. (2014). Collaboration and “diffuse reciprocity”. Stanford Social Innovation Review. URL: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collaboration_and_diffuse_reciprocity [Apr 25 2014].
Krapels, J., Disley, E., Corbett, J., Scraggs, E. and Baruch, B. (2016). Evaluation of EPIM III 2012-2015. Cambridge, UK: RAND Europe.
Kubisch, A. C., Auspos, P., Brown, P., and Dewar, T. (2011). Voices from the field III: Lessons and challenges from two decades of community-change efforts. The Foundation Review, 3(1&2), 138-149.
Langlois, M. (2011). Building for uncharted seas: A funders collaborative. A case study and reflection tool of the Waterloo Region Resiliency Initiative. Waterloo, ON: Skipping Stones Consulting.
Leat, D. (2009). More than money: The potential of cross-sector relationships. London, UK: Big Lottery Fund and Association of Charitable Foundations Intelligent Funding Forum.
Lefèvre, S. (2015). Pour une approche sociopolitique de la philanthropie financière : plaidoyer pour un programme de recherche. Politique et sociétés, 34(2), 61-85.
Lewis, S.G., Friedmann, J. and Schoneboom, J. (2010). Accomplishments of the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa, 2011-2010. Report on a decade of collaborative foundation investment. New York: Carnegie Corporation & Partnership for Higher Education in Africa.
Longtin, D. (2015a). Étude de cas sur le Groupe de travail des bailleurs de fonds pour le développement des jeunes enfants. Working paper #6. Montreal: PhiLab.
Longtin, D. (2015b). Portrait des réseaux de financement des membres du Canadian Environmental Grantmakers’ Network. Working paper #7. Montreal:PhiLab.
MacKinnon, A. (2006). Working together to achieve greater impact: The Donors’ Education Collaborative of New York City. Case Study No 3: Principles for Effective Education Grantmaking. Portland, OR: Grantmakers for Education.
Marek, L.I., Brock, D.P. and Savla, J. (2015). Evaluating collaboration for effectiveness: Conceptualization and measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 67-85.
Marra, L. (2015). Three ways to maximize impact through collaboration. GMNsight, 6. URL: http://www.gmnsight.org/three-ways-to-maximize-impact-through-collaboration/
McCray, J. (2014). Is grantmaking getting smarter? A national field study of philanthropic practice. Washington, DC: Grantmakers for Effective Organizations.
McDougall, C.L. (2016). Northern Manitoba Food, Culture and Community Fund: An exploration of an innovative collaborative model. Working paper #10. Montreal: PhiLab.
Morris, T. (2014). The Future of Freshwater Funding in Canada: Mobilizing Collective Resources for Healthy Watersheds. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Grantmakers Network.
Morris, T. (2015). Collective impact: Nice buzz words or a transformative shift in how funders do business? CEGN Water Funders gathering backgrounder. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Grantmakers Network.
Mulgan, G. (2016). Collaboration and collective impact: How can funders, NGOs, governments and citizens achieve more together? URL: http://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/collaboration-and-collective-impact [posted Feb 1 2016]
Paarlberg, L.E and Meinhold, S.S. (2012). Using institutional theory to explore local variations in United Way’s Community Impact model. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 826-849.
Parker, S. (2010). Lessons from a ten-year funder collaborative: A case study of the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa. St. Johnsbury, VT: Clear Thinking Communications.
Patrizi, P., & Thompson, E.H. (2011). Beyond the veneer of strategic philanthropy. The Foundation Review, 2(3), 52-60.
Patrizi, P., Thompson, E.H., Coffman, J., Beer, T., (2013). Eyes wide open: learning as strategy under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. The Foundation Review, 5(3), 50-65.
Patton, M. Q., Foote, N., & Radner, J. (2015). A foundation's theory of philanthropy: What it is, what it provides, how to do it. The Foundation Review, 7(4), 7-20.
Patton, M. Q., & Patrizi, P. A. (2010). Strategy as the focus for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 128, 5-28.
Pearson, H. (2010). Funder collaboratives: trend or tool. The Philanthropist, 23(2), 120-125.
Pearson, H. (2014). Collective impact: venturing on an unfamiliar road. The Philanthropist, 26(1), 49-53.
Pfitzer, M. & Stamp, M. (2010). Multiplying impact through philanthropic collaboration. A report for the European Foundation Centre. Brussels: European Foundation Centre and FSG.
Philanthropic Foundations Canada (2012). Funder collaboration: making it work. 2012 PFC Symposium highlights. URL: www.pfc.ca
Pole, N. and Community Foundations of Canada (2015). Vital Signs: an exploratory case study of community foundations’ local collaborations in a national program context. Working Paper #8. Montréal: PhiLab.
Pole, N. (2016). Collaboration among grantmaking foundations: A review of the literature. Working paper #14. Montreal: PhiLab.
Prager, J. (2011). Promise or pitfall? How foundations collaborate and develop partnerships. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.
Proscio, T. (2010). Common Effort, Uncommon Wealth: Lessons from Living Cities on the Challenges and Opportunities of Collaboration in Philanthropy. Commissioned report for Living Cities. URL: https://www.livingcities.org/about/history
Putnam-Walkerly, K. & Russell, E. (2014). Many voices, one goal: How an informal foundation collaborative helped make California history. Cleveland, OH: Putnam Consulting Group.
Reich, R. (2013). What are foundations for? Boston Review, March/April. URL: http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/foundations-philanthropy-democracy
Richardson, R, (2012). Funder collaboratives: Where the work touches the ground. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Grantmakers Network.
Seldon, W., Tierney, T.J. and Fernando, G. (2013). High stakes donor collaborations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2013, 45-51.
Silkes, S. (2016). Sustainable food systems: A landscape assessment for Canadian philanthropy. J.W. McConnell Family Foundation, Tides Canada and Community Foundations of Canada.
The Philanthropic Initiative (2010). Donor collaboration: Power in numbers. Boston: The Philanthropic Initiative.
Tomalty, R. (2013). Sustainable cities: The role for philanthropy in promoting urban sustainability. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Grantmakers Network.
Turner, S., Merchant, K., Kania, J. & Martin, E. (2012). Understanding the value of backbone organizations in collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, July 2012, 17-20.
Wei-Skillern, J., Silver, N. and Heitz, E. (2013). Cracking the network code: Four principles for grantmakers. Washington, DC: Grantmakers for Effective Organizations.
Wiley, P., Bierly, K., Reeve, T. and Smith, K. (2013). When local solutions aren’t enough: a strategic funding partnership to restore a large river system. The Foundation Review, 5(1), 89-104.
Woodland, R. H. and Hutton, M.S. (2012). Evaluating organizational collaborations: Suggested entry points and strategies. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 366-383.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research / Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l'économie sociale [thereafter CJNSER] will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, and that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a not-for-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility. In keeping with this principle, the journal will publish all of its issues online.
Authors who publish in CJNSER agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
[Content published between 2010 and 2019-10 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA) License. Content published between 2019-10 to 2023-12 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Content published after 2023-12 is licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 International (CC BY) License.]
