Biting the Hand that Feeds You? Exploring Whether (and How) Government Funding Constrains Charities’ Engagement in Public Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser801Keywords:
charities, advocacy, policy engagement, Canada Revenue AgencyAbstract
This article examines relationships between federal government funding and reported spending by charities on what the Canada Revenue Agency defined as “political activities” over the period 2003–2017. Anecdotal evidence suggests that many charities in Canada see dependence on government funding by other charities as a factor that limits policy engagement. Comparative research generally suggests that government funding is positively associated with policy engagement by charities, but also that it channels charities away from outsider or contentious forms of advocacy toward less confrontational, insider strategies. The CRA data on political activities analyzed here adds important insights because it tracks outsider advocacy involving public calls to action, which government funding is expected to constrain. This analysis finds that charities with federal funding were more likely to report political activities than those with no federal funding, but only to a point and with important differences based on the size of charities.
Downloads
References
References
Bass, G. et al. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. The Aspen Institute.
Berry, G. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Brookings Institution Press.
Bloodgood, E., & Tremblay-Boire, J. (2016). Does government funding depoliticize non-governmental organizations? Examining evidence from Europe European Political Science Review 9(3), 401-424.
Blumberg, M. (2012). How Accurate Are the T3010 Charity Returns When It Comes to ‘Political Activities’? https://www.canadiancharitylaw.ca/blog/how_accurate_are_the_t3010_registered_charity_information_returns/
Charity Insights Canada Project. 2024. “Policy participation.” July 24.
Chaves, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American Sociological Review 69, pp. 292-316.
Chewinski, Max, and Catherine Corrigall–Brown. (2020). Channeling advocacy? Assessing how funding source shapes the strategies of environmental organizations. Social Movement Studies 19(2), pp. 222-240.
Clément, D. (2017). State Funding for Human Rights Activism: Channeling Protest? American Behavioral Scientist 61(13), pp. 1703-1728.
Corrigall-Brown, C. and M. Ho. (2015). How the state shapes social movements: An examination of the environmental movement in Canada. In H. Ramos and K. Rodgers (Eds.) Protest and Politics. University of British Columbia Press.
CRA. (2003). Political Activities. Policy statement CPS-022.
CRA. (2003b). Other purposes beneficial to the community. Policy statement CSP-C10.
CRA. (2019). Public policy dialogue and development activities by charities. Guidance CG-027. https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/charities/policies-guidance/public-policy-dialogue-development-activities.html
CRA. (No date). Types of registered charities (designations). https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/charities/registering-charitable-qualified-donee-status/apply-become-registered-charity/establishing/types-registered-charities-designations.html
DeVita, C., M. Nikolova, and K. Roeger. (2014). Nonprofit Advocacy in the Nation's Capital. In R. Pekkanen, S. Smith and Y. Tsujinaka (Eds.). Nonprofits and Advocacy: Engaging Community and Government in an Era of Retrenchment. Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 85–106.
Garrow, E. and Y. Hasenfeld, Y. (2012). Institutional logics, moral frames, and advocacy: Explaining the purpose of advocacy among nonprofit human-service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (1), pp. 80-98.
Gibbins, R. (2016). The Moral Imperative for Policy Advocacy. The Philanthropist Journal. https://thephilanthropist.ca/2016/02/the-moral-imperative-for-policy-advocacy/
Grasse, N., K. Ward and K. Miller‐Stevens. (2021). To lobby or not to lobby? Examining the determinants of nonprofit organizations taking the IRS 501 (h) election. Policy Studies Journal 49(1), pp. 242-267.
Guo, C. and G. Saxton. (2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and nonprofit
Advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum 1(1), pp. 1-25.
Hall, M. et al. (2005). The Canadian Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective. Imagine Canda.
Imagine Canada. 2021. Canada’s Charities and Nonprofits. https://www.imaginecanada.ca/sites/default/files/Infographic-sector-stat-2021.pdf
INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence. 2017. The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Jenkins, J. C. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy. In W. Powell (Ed.) The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. Yale University Press.
Jenkins, J. and C. Eckert. (1986). Channeling black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the black movement. American Sociological Review 51, pp. 812-829.
Jenkins, J. and A. Halcli. (1999). Grassrooting the system? The development and impact of social movement philanthropy, 1953–1990. In E.C. Lagemann (Ed.). Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities. Indiana University Press, pp. 229-256.
Kelleher, C. and S. Yackee. (2009). “A political consequence of contracting: Organized interests and state agency decision making” Journal of public administration research and theory 19 (3), pp. 579-602.
Kirkby, G. (2014). An Uncharitable Chill: A Critical Exploration of How Changes in Federal Policy and Political Climate Are Affecting Advocacy-oriented Charities. Master’s Thesis, Royal Roads University.
Lang, S. 2012. NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lasby, B. and E. Cordeaux. (2016). Imagine Canada’s Sector Monitor. https://sectorsource.ca/sites/default/files/resources/files/sector_monitor_public_policy_activity_2016.pdf
Leech, B. (2006). Funding faction or buying silence? Grants, contracts, and interest group lobbying behavior. Policy Studies Journal 34(1), pp. 7-35.
Leroux, K. and H. Goerdel. (2009). “Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic
management explanation” Public Performance & Management Review 32(4), pp. 514-536.
Lu, J. (2016). Fear the government? A meta-analysis of the impact of government funding on nonprofit advocacy engagement. The American Review of Public Administration 48 (3), pp. 203-218.
McCarthy, J. and M. Zald. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American journal of sociology 82(6), pp. 1212-1241.
Moulton, S., and A. Eckerd. (2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector: Resources,
roles, and public values. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(4), pp. 656-685.
Mosley, J. (2011). Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: What tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly 40(3), 435-457.
Mosley, J. (2012). “Keeping the Lights On: How Government Funding Concerns Drive the Advocacy Agendas of Nonprofit Homeless Service Providers” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(4), pp. 841–866.
Mulé, N. and G. DeSantis (Eds). (2017). The Shifting Terrain: Non-Profit Advocacy in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Neumayr, M., U. Schneider and M. Meyer. (2015). “Public funding and its impact on nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly 44 (2), pp. 297-318.
Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2009). The stages and strategies of advocacy among nonprofit reproductive health providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38, pp. 1044-1053.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16(1), pp. 145-179.
O’Neil, M. 1989. Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Onyx, J. et al. (2010). Advocacy with gloves on: The “manners” of strategy used by some third sector organizations undertaking advocacy in NSW and Queensland. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 21, pp. 41-61.
O’Regan, K., & Oster, S. (2002). Does government funding alter nonprofit governance? Evidence from New York City nonprofit contractors. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21, pp. 359-379.
Pekkanen, R. and S. Smith. (2014). “Nonprofit Advocacy: Definitions and Concepts.” In R. Pekkanen, S. Smith and Y. Tsujinaka (Eds.) Nonprofts and Advocacy: Engaging Community and Government in an Era of Retrenchment. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
Salamon, L. (2002). Explaining Nonprofit Advocacy: An Exploratory Analysis. Johns Hopkins University Center for Civil Society Studies, Working Paper Series.
Sandfort, J. (2005). Casa de Esperanza. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 15 (3), pp. 371-382.
Schmid, H., M. Bar and R. Nirel. (2008). Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations: Implications for policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37, pp. 581-602.
Suárez, D. (2009). Nonprofit advocacy and civic engagement on the internet. Administration
& Society 41, pp. 267-289.
Suárez, D. and H. Hwang. (2008). Civic Engagement and Nonprofit Lobbying in California, 1998–2003. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37(1): pp. 93–112.
Tomlinson, B. (2016). Small and Medium Sized Canadian Civil-Society organizations as Development Actors. A Review of Evidence. Inter-council Network.
Wolch, J. (2014). The shadow state: transformations in the voluntary sector. In J. Wolch, and M. Dear (Eds.). The Power of Geography. Routledge, pp. 197-221.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John Cameron, Heather Dicks, Liam Swiss
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research / Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l'économie sociale [thereafter CJNSER] will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, and that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a not-for-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility. In keeping with this principle, the journal will publish all of its issues online.
Authors who publish in CJNSER agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
[Content published between 2010 and 2019-10 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA) License. Content published between 2019-10 to 2023-12 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Content published after 2023-12 is licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 International (CC BY) License.]
