Analysing the Social Economy Business Survey Index (S-BSI): Development, Features, and Effectiveness in Social Economy Policymaking and Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser701Keywords:
Social Economy Business Survey Index, social economy, social and economic value creation, policy effectiveness, next generation of public policyAbstract
This study delves into the Social Economy Business Survey Index (S-BSI), a tool designed to monitor the social and economic value generated within the social economy (SE) to furnish vital insights for timely public policy interventions. The study aims to comprehensively analyze the S-BSI, encompassing its development, distinctive features, and effectiveness as an advanced instrument for policymaking and evaluating the SE policy. The research methodology comprises an in-depth analysis of the S-BSI's development process, followed by multiple comparative analyses of similar surveys on a domestic and international scale. Furthermore, the study utilizes qualitative evaluation techniques grounded in the next-generation public policy framework for the SE sector. This multifaceted research approach aims to offer a holistic understanding of the S-BSI, delivering valuable insights tailored for policymakers and stakeholders engaged in shaping public policies for the SE.
Downloads
References
Bouchard, M. J., & Rousselière, D. (2015). The weight of the social economy: An international perspective. Bruxelles: PIE Peter Lang.
Bouri, A., C. J. Fonzi, S. Gelfand, A. Gromis, K. Lankester, G. Leung, K. McCarthy, et al., (2011). Data Driven: A Performance Analysis for the Impact Investing Industry. New York: Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS), Global Impact Investing Network.
Bryson, J., G. Cunningham and K. Lokkesmoe., (2002), What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: The Case of Problem Formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota, Public Administration Review, 62, 5, 568–84.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Powers, C. W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., David, B., Duffy, L. K., Jewett, S. C., & Volz, C. D. (2005). Science, policy, and stakeholders: developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska, Environmental Management, 35, 557-568.
Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double Botom Line Project Report: Assessing Social Impact In Double Botom Line Ventures. Rockefeller Foundaton. Retrieved from htp://www.riseproject.org/DBL_Method_Catalog
Chaves, R. (2012). Las políticas públicas y las cooperativas. Ekonomiaz. Revista Vasca de Economía, 79, 168-199. (In Spanish)
Chaves, R. (2008). Las actividades de cobertura institucional: infraestructuras de apoyo y políticas de apoyo a la economía social. La Economía Social en España en el año, 565-592. (In Spanish)
Chaves, R. (Ed.). (2020). La nueva generación de políticas públicas de fomento de la economía social en España (The new generation of public policies to promote the social economy in Spain). Tirant lo Blanch. (In Spanish)
Cosa, M., & Urban, B. (2023). A systematic review of performance measurement systems and their relevance to social enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1-29.
Costa, E. and Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2014-0092
Defourny, J., 2001, From third sector to social enterprise. The emergence of social enterprise, London and New York, Routledge, 1-18
Demoustier, D., Draperi, J. F., Lambert, M., Fretel, A., Lethielleux, L., ... & Roger, B. (2020). Atlas commenté de l'économie sociale et solidaire. Observatoire national de l'économie sociale et solidaire (France). Juris éditions
Ebrahim, A. and Rangan, V.K. (2010). The limits of nonprofit impact: a contingency framework for measuring social performance, Working Paper 10-099, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
Enjolras, B. (2009). The public policy paradox. Normative foundations of social economy and public policies: Which consequences for evaluation strategies. The worth of the social economy: An international perspective, 43-62.
Emerson, J., Wachowicz, J. and Chun, S. (2000). Social return on investment: exploring aspects of value creation in the nonprofit sector. The Box Set: Social Purpose Enterprises and Venture Philanthropy in the New Millennium, The Roberts Foundation, San Francisco, CA.
Florman, M., Klinger-Vidra, R. and Facada, M.J. (2016). A critical evaluation of social impact assessment methodologies and a call to measure economic and social impact holistically through the external rate of return platform, Working Paper 160, London School of Economics Enterprise, London, pp. 1-32.
Gelper, S., Lemmens, A., & Croux, C. (2007). Consumer sentiment and consumer spending: decomposing the Granger causal relationship in the time domain. Applied Economics, 39(1), 1-11.
GIIN. (2011). Data Driven: A Performance Analysis for the Impact Investing Industry. In 2011 IRIS Data Report. New York, NY: Global Impact Investing Network. Accessed July 14, 2014. http://www.thegiin.org/binarydata/Data_Driven_IRIS
_report_final.pdf.
Golinelli, R., & Parigi, G. (2004). Consumer sentiment and economic activity: a cross country comparison. Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, 2004(2), 147-170.
Gugerty, M. K., & Karlan, D. (2018). Ten reasons not to measure impact–and what to do instead. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(3), 41-47.
Grieco, Cecilia. (2015). Assessing Social Impact of Social Enterprises: Does One Size Really Fit All? Springer Briefs in Business; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 978-3-319-15314-8.
Jung, J.R., Cho G.B., & Lee. B. R. (2020) Domestic and international case study on building a pool of social value indicators. Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency. (In Korean)
Kah, S., & Akenroye, T. (2020). Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: a systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(4), 381-402.
Killick, T. (1993). The adaptive economy: adjustment policies in small, low-income countries. World Bank Publications.
Kim, J. Y. (2022). A study of the development of the Business Survey Index for social economy enterprises. Social Economy & Policy Studies, 12(1). (In Korean)
Kim, J.Y. and Kim, J.S. (2021). Research on the development of business trend index (BSI) for social economy enterprises. KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency): Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency). Policy Research Team. (2019). Korea Social Economy. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. Available online: https://www.socialenterprise.or.kr/social/board/view.do?m_cd=F077&pg=1&board_code=BO04&category_id=CA06&category_sub_id=&com_certifi_num=&selectyear=&magazine=&title=&search_word=%ed%95%9c%ea%b5%ad%ec%9d%98+%ec%82%ac%ed%9a%8c%ec%a0%81%ea%b2%bd%ec%a0%9c&search_type=titl&seq_no=240840 (accessed on 14 December 2023)
KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency). (2022). The Social Economy Business Survey Index results for the second quarter of 2022. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. (In Korean) Available online: https://www.socialenterprise.
or.kr/social/board/view.do?pg=1&m_cd=D024&seq_no=248130&search_word=&search_type=&board_code=BO04&category_id=CA01&com_certifi_num=&selectyear=&magazine=&mode=view (accessed on 14 December 2023)
KoSEA (Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency). (2023). The Social Enterprise Business Survey Index results for the third quarter of 2023. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. (In Korean) Available online: https://www.socialenterprise.
or.kr/social/board/view.do?m_cd=D024&board_code=BO04&category_id=CA01&seq_no=250398&pg=&search_type=&search_word= (accessed on 14 December 2023)
Kroeger A., Weber C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review 39(4): 513–540.
Lab, B. (2013). What is a GIIRS Impact Rating. B Lab. Accessed August 27, 2013. http://giirs.org/about-giirs/how-giirs-works/159.
Laurisz, N. (2019). The role of stakeholders in development of social economy organizations in Poland: an integrative approach. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 74.
Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social impact measurement: Classification of methods. Environmental management accounting and supply chain management, 171-202.
Martínez, M.I., Castro, R.B, Alemán, D., Guilló, N. and De Diego, P. (2020). Análisis del impacto socioeconómico de los valores y principios de la Economía Social en España. CEPES. (In Spanish)
Martinos, H., Johnson, T., Tödtling-Schönhofer, H. (2020). The impact of social economy at the local and regional level, European Committee of the Regions, Commission for Social Policy, Education, Employment, Research and Culture, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2863/781060
Mojtahedi, M., & Oo, B. L. (2017). Critical attributes for proactive engagement of stakeholders in disaster risk management. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 21, 35-43.
Mulgan, G. (2010). Measuring social value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(3), 38-43.
Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision making, 6(8), 771-781.
Nie, M. (2004). State Wildlife Policy and Management: The Scope and Bias of Political Conflict. Public Administration Review, 64, 2, 221–33.
OECD (2017). Governing better through evidence-informed policy making. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/gov/governing-better-through-evidence-informed-policy-making-proceedings.pdf
Papineau, D. and M.C. Kiely. (1996). Participatory Evaluation in a Community Organization: Fostering Stakeholder Empowerment and Utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 1, 79–93.
Pathak, P., & Dattani, P., (2014). Social return on investment: three technical challenges. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 91-104.
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Taieb, S. B., ... & Ziel, F. (2022). Forecasting: theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), 705-871.
Porter, S., & Shortall, S. (2009). Stakeholders and perspectivism in qualitative policy evaluation: a realist reflection. Public Administration, 87(2), 259-273.
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 43(1), 82-115.
Seo, J. (2024) From boom to transformation: assessing the paradigm shift in public policies for the Social Economy in South Korea, Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2296627
Salazar, J. de J., Husted B. W., Biehl M. (2012). Thoughts on the evaluation of corporate social performance through projects. Journal of Business Ethics 105(2): 175–186.
Silva, V., Lima, V., Sá, J. C., Fonseca, L., & Santos, G. (2022). B impact assessment as a sustainable tool: Analysis of the certification model. Sustainability, 14(9), 5590.
United Nations. (2015). Handbook on economic tendency surveys. Stat Pap, 96, 1-158.
Utting, P. (2017). "Public policies for social and solidarity economy. Assessing Progress in Seven Countries." ILO/International Labour Office (ILO): Geneva, Switzerland.
Van Woensel, L., Evidence for policy-making Foresight-based scientific advice, European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament, April 2021. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690529/EPRS_BRI(2021)690529_EN.pdf
Vedung, E. (1997). Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K), Transaction Publishers, 36-39.
WEF (World Economic Forum). (2022). Unlocking the Social Economy Towards an inclusive and resilient society. Insight Report. World Economic Forum and Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship: New York, USA. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Unlocking_the_Social_Economy_
pdf (accessed on 14 December 2023)
Wood, C., & Leighton, D. (2010). Measuring social value: the gap between policy and practice. Undercurrent, (2), 7-9.
Yi, J. B., & Chun, S. H. (2022). The Effect of Cash Incentive Projects on the Social Value Performances of Social Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis of SK’s Social Progress Credit in Korea. Sustainability, 14(10), 6310.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jiae Seo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research / Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l'économie sociale [thereafter CJNSER] will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, and that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a not-for-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility. In keeping with this principle, the journal will publish all of its issues online.
Authors who publish in CJNSER agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
[Content published between 2010 and 2019-10 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA) License. Content published between 2019-10 to 2023-12 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Content published after 2023-12 is licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 International (CC BY) License.]
