Nonprofits and the Promotion of Civic Engagement: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the "Civic Footprint" of Nonprofits within Local Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2014v5n1a158Keywords:
Nonprofits, Civic engagement, Voluntary associations, Civil society, Civic benefits / Associations à but non lucratif, Engagement civique, Organisations bénévoles, Société civile, Bénéfices civiquesAbstract
ABSTRACT
The literature suggests that nonprofit organizations provide civic benefits by promoting engagement within local communities. However, there exists minimal empirical evidence describing the ways in which nonprofits actually undertake this role. In order to address this omission, we conducted interviews with personnel of nonprofit organizations in one rural community in the United States. Our preliminary findings indicate that nonprofit organizations promote civic engagement through programs and activities that: 1) engage volunteers and donors; 2) bring community members together; 3) collaborate with organizations within and beyond the community; and 4) promote community education and awareness. Together, these findings help to develop a working model to understand the civic footprint of nonprofit organizations with methodological implications for future research that would seek to measure the extent to which nonprofits promote civic engagement.
Il est normal de supposer que les associations à but non lucratif favorisent l’engagement du citoyen dans les communautés locales. Cependant, il existe peu de données empiriques sur la manière dont ces associations assument véritablement ce rôle. Pour combler ce manque, nous avons mené des entretiens semi-directifs approfondis auprès du personnel d’associations à but non lucratif dans une petite communauté rurale aux États-Unis. Nos résultats préliminaires indiquent que ces associations motivent les citoyens à s’impliquer quand elles offrent des programmes et des activités qui : 1) intéressent les bénévoles et les donateurs; 2) rassemblent directement ou indirectement les membres de la communauté; 3) collaborent avec d’autres associations tant au sein de la communauté qu’au-delà de celle-ci; et 4) encouragent l’éducation et la conscientisation communautaires. Ces constats aident à établir un modèle pour mieux comprendre la présence civique des associations à but non lucratif dans les communautés et indiquent une piste à suivre pour des recherches futures qui examineraient l’influence de ces associations sur le niveau de participation civique.
Downloads
References
Acheson, N. (2001). Service delivery and civic engagement: Disability organizations in Northern Ireland. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(3), 279-283.
Andrews, K.T., Ganz, M., Baggetta, M., Han, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Leadership, membership, and voice: Civic associations that work. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1191-1242.
Ben-Ner, A and Gui, B. (eds.) (1993) The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA.
Ben-Ner, A and Van Hoomissen, T. (1992) An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, non-profit and government sectors, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63(3), 391-415.
Brown, L.D. (1998) Creating social capital: Nongovernment development organizations and intersectoral problem solving, in W. W. Powell and E. S. Clemens, eds., Private action and the public good, Yale University Press, New Haven, USA, pp. 228-241.
Charmaz, K. (2000) Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructionist methods, in N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincolnn, eds., Handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA, pp. 509-535.
Cnaan, R.A. (2009) Valuing the contribution of urban religious congregations, Public Management Review, 11(5), 641-662.
Douglas, J. (1987) Political theories of nonprofit organization, in W. W. Powell, ed., The nonprofit sector: A research handbook , Yale University Press, New Haven, USA, pp. 43-54.
Fetterman, D.M. (2008) Ethnography, in L.M. Given, ed., The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA, pp. 288-292.
Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20(1), 159-179.
Glasser, B.G and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research,Aldine Press, New York, USA.
Goetz, J.P and LeCompte, M.P. (1984) Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research, Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
Handy, F., Seto, S., Wakaruk, A., Mersey, B., Mejia, A., & Copeland, L. (2010). The discerning consumer: Is nonprofit status a factor? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 866-883.
Hansmann, H. (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise, Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835-899.
Henderson, A., Brown, S.D., & Pancer, S.M. (2012). Political and social dynamics of civic engagement: The impact of compulsory community services. Politics and Policy, 40(1), 93-130.
James, E. (1987) The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective in W.W. Powell, ed., The nonprofit sector: A research handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, USA, pp. 397-415.
Katz, M.B. (1993) Reframing the ‘underclass’ debate, in M. B. Katz (e.d.), The underclass debate: Views from history, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, pp. 440-477.
Kitzes, J. and Wackernagel, M. (2009) Answers to common questions in ecological footprint. Accounting, Ecological Indicators, 9(4), 812–817.
Koos, S. (2012). The institutional embeddedness of social responsibility: A multilevel analysis of smaller firms’ civic engagement in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 135-162.
Kramer, R.M. (1981) Voluntary agencies in the welfare state, University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
Lee, S. (2003) The regulation of fundraising: In search of the “public good” or an intractable problem of vested interest, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 307-16
Lefkovitz, P.M., Pinsoneault, L.T., Bonbright, D., & Nguyen, L.T. (2013). Potential best practices for enhancing civic engagement outcomes (field notes). Families in Society, 94(1), 61-63.
Lelieveldt, H., Dekker, K., Volker, B., & Torenvlied, R. (2009). Civic organizations as political actors: Mapping and predicting the involvement of civic organizations in neighbourhood problem solving and coproduction. Urban Affairs Review, 45(1), 3-24.
LeRoux, K. (2007) Nonprofits as civic intermediaries: The role of community-based organizations in promoting political participation, Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 410-422.
Miller, M.K. (2009). Debating group structure: How local, translocal, and national voluntary organizations promote democracy. The Social Science Journal, 46(1), 47-69.
Milligan, C and Conradson, D., eds. (2006) Landscapes of voluntarism: New spaces of health, welfare and governance. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
Mulroy, E.A. (2004). University civic engagement with community-based organizations: Dispersed or coordinated models. Journal of Community Practice, 12(3/4), 35-52.
Netting, F.E., O’Connor, M.K., Fauri, D.P. (2007). Planning transformative programs: Challeng-es for advocates in translating change processes into effectiveness measures. Administration in Social Work, 31(4), 59-81.
Omoto, A.M., Snyder, M., & Hackett, J.D. (2010). Personality and motivational antecedents of activism and civic engagement. Journal of Personality, 76(6), 1703-1734.
Ott, S.J. (2001) The nonprofit sector’s distinctive values and contributions to society, in S. J. Ott, ed., The nature of the nonprofit sector, Westview Press, Cambridge, USA, pp. 47-56.
Pelfrey, S and Theisen, B. (1993) Valuing the community benefits provided by non-profit Hospitals, Journal of Nursing Administration, 23, 16-21.
Polonsky, M and Grau, S. L. (2008) Evaluating the social value of charitable organizations: A conceptual foundation. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(2), 130-140.
Polson, E.C., Kim, T., Jang, S.J., Johnson, B.R., & Smith, B. (2013). Being prepared and staying connected: Scouting’s influence on social capital and community involvement. Social Science Quarterly, 94(3), 758-776.
Putnam, R. (1993) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon and Schuster, New York, USA.
Rees, W.E. (1992) Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out?, Environment & Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130.
Richards-Schuster, K., & Dobbie, D. (2011). Tagging walls and planting seeds: Creating spaces for youth civic action. Journal of Community Practice, 19(3), 234-251.
Richmond, B.J., Mook, L and Quarter, J. (2003) Social accounting for nonprofits: Two models, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13(4), 308-323.
Schlesinger, M., Mitchell, S. and Gray, B. (2003) Measuring community benefits provided by nonprofit and for-profit HMOs, Inquiry, 40(2),114-132.
Schneider, J.A. (2013). Connections and disconnections between civic engagement and social capital in community-based nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 572-597.
Shiller, J. (2013). Preparing for democracy: How community-based organizations build civic engagement among urban youth. Urban Education, 48(1), 69-91.
Terriquez, V. (2011). Schools for democracy: Labor union participation and Latino immigrant parents’ school-based civic engagement. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 581-601.
Tocqueville, A. (1966 [1835]). Democracy in America, Harper & Row Press, New York, USA.
Van Slyke, D.M and Roch, C.H. (2004) What do they know, and whom do they hold accountable? Citizens in the government-nonprofit contracting relationship, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 191-209.
Wackernagel, M and Rees, W.E. (1996) Our ecological Footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.
Weisbrod, B.A. (1986) Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy, in S. Rose-Ackerman, ed., The economics of nonprofit institution, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp. 21-44.
Wolpert, J. (1993a) Decentralization and equity in public and nonprofit sectors, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(4), 281-296.
Wuthnow, R. (2004) Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
Young, D.R. (2007). Toward a normative theory of nonprofit finance, in DR. Young, ed., Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice, AltaMira Press, London, UK, pp. 339-372.
Zullo, R. (2013). Organized labor’s civic niche. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 781-802.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research / Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l'économie sociale [thereafter CJNSER] will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, and that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a not-for-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility. In keeping with this principle, the journal will publish all of its issues online.
Authors who publish in CJNSER agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
[Content published between 2010 and 2019-10 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA) License. Content published between 2019-10 to 2023-12 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Content published after 2023-12 is licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 International (CC BY) License.]
