Civic and Community Engagement among Poor Rural Women in Bihar: A Pilot Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser688Keywords:
civic engagement, community engagement, self-help groups, women’s empowermentAbstract
Civic and community engagement is often crucial for the successful development of rural areas and a catalyst of personal transformation. This article examines changes in civic and community engagement among women in rural Bihar, India. Using an exploratory factor analysis of survey data from n = 815 respondents who participated in Heifer’s Values-Based Holistic Community Development [VBHCD] training, the study identifies three factors that constitute civic and community engagement. Next, the study assesses the efficacy of VBHCD’s impact on participants’ civic and community engagement relative to participants’ duration in the program and type of self-help group. The results indicate that pass-on groups are more civically active in their community than original groups. However, civic and community engagement wanes over the course of participation in Heifer’s intervention.
Downloads
References
References
Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”?. Journal of transformative education, 3(3), 236-253. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1541344605276792
Attree, P., French, B., Milton, B., Povall, S., Whitehead, M., & Popay, J. (2011). The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence. Health & Social Care in the community, 19(3), 250-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x
Bracht, N., Kingsbury, L., & Rissel, C. (1999). A five stage community organization model for health promotion: Empowerment and partnership strategies. In Bracht (Ed.), Health promotion at the community level: Two new advances. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Baker, L., Wright, K., Laufer, C., & Spencer-Carver, E. (2015). A Study of Civic Engagement Among Older Adults in Eastern Jackson County.
Barakso, M. (2005). Civic Engagement and Voluntary Associations: Reconsidering the Role of the Governance Structures of Advocacy Groups. Polity 37, 315–334 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300016
Brody, C., Hoop, T. D., Vojtkova, M., Warnock, R., Dunbar, M., Murthy, P., & Dworkin, S. L. (2017). Can self-help group programs improve women’s empowerment? A systematic review. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(1), 15-40. DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2016.1206607
Casini, P., Vandewalle, L., & Wahhaj, Z. (2017). Public good provision in Indian rural areas: The returns to collective action by microfinance groups. The World Bank Economic Review, 31(1), 97-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv041
Centers for Disease Control [CDC] (2011). Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. Principles of Community Engagement, second edition. Retrieved from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/index.html
Chakraborty, S., Joshi, M., Singh, D., Priyadarshini, A., and Choudhary, S. (2020). Exploring Time Use and Care Work: Why Are So Many Women Absent from the Workforce in Bihar? (Sakshamaa Briefing Paper). Available at: https://www.c3india.org/uploads/news/Briefing_Paper_Time_Use_and_Care_Work_11_12_2020.pdf
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
Datta, U. (2015). Socio-economic impacts of JEEViKA: A large-scale self-help group project in Bihar, India. World Development, 68, 1-18. doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.013
Department of Economic Affairs, Economic Division. (2021). Economic Survey 2021-2022. Retrieved from: https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2022-23/economicsurvey/index.php
Desai, R. M., & Joshi, S. (2014). Collective action and community development: Evidence from self-help groups in rural India. The World Bank Economic Review, 28(3), 492-524, https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht024
De Vries, J. (2008). Goats for the poor: Some keys to successful promotion of goat production among the poor. Small Ruminant Research, 77(2-3), 221-224.
De Vries, J. (2011). Heifer's approach to sustainable community development. Journal of agricultural & food information, 12(1), 40-48
De Vries, J. D. (2012) Passing on the gift as an approach to sustainable development programmes. Development in Practice, 22, 373-384. DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2012.664626
Dierolf, T. S., Kern, R., Ogborn, T., Protti, M. & Schwartz, M. (2002). Heifer International: Growing a learning organization. Development in Practice, 12, 436-448. DOI: 10.1080/0961450220149780
Diller, E. C. (2001). Citizens in service: The challenge of delivering civic engagement training to national service programs. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.
Eliasoph, N. (2016). The mantra of empowerment talk: An essay. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 247-265. DOI: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215895
Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), DOI: 10.1177/1609406915621420
Fitzpatrick, E., & Akgungor, S. (2020). The contribution of social capital on rural livelihoods: Malawi and the Philippines cases. The Annals of Regional Science, 1-21. DOI:10.1007/s00168-020-01005-2
Government of Bihar. Finance Department. (2020). Bihar Economic Survey 2019-2020. Government of Bihar Publisher. Available at: https://state.bihar.gov.in/finance/cache/12/Reports/Economic-Survey-2020-EN.pdf
Grootaert, C. (Ed.). (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire (No. 18). World Bank Publications.
Janzen, S. A., Magnan, N., Sharma, S., & Thompson, W. M. (2021). Pay it forward: Impacts of a rural livelihoods program with built-in spillovers (No. 312711). Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Kafle, K., Michelson, H., & Winter-Nelson, A. (2019). His, hers, or ours: Impacts of a training and asset transfer programme on intra-household decision-making in Zambia. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(9), 2046-2064. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1516868
Kagan, C., Castile, S., & Stewart, A. (2005). Participation: Are some more equal than others? Clinical Psychology Forum, 153, 30-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2005.1.153.30
Katz, A. H., & Bender, E. I. (1976). The strength in us: Self help groups in the modem world. New York: New Viewpoints/Franklin Watts.
Kingdon, G. G. (2007). The progress of school education in India. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 168-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm015
Lahiri‐Dutt, K. U. N. T. A. L. A., & Samanta, G. (2006). Constructing social capital: Self‐help groups and rural women's development in India. Geographical Research, 44(3), 285-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2006.00390.x
Mahato, S. N., & Bajracharya, S. L. (2009). Can goat be a vehicle in a pathway out of poverty?. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 11(1), 13-16.
Malhotra, A., and S. R. Schuler. 2005. “Women’s Empowerment as a Variable in InternationalDevelopment.” In Measuring Empowerment: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, edited by D. Narayan, 219–246. Washington, DC: World Bank
Mazzoleni, G. (2000). A return to civic and political engagement prompted by personalized political leadership?. Political communication, 17(4), 325-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050178915
McBride, A. M., Sherraden, M. S., & Pritzker, S. (2006). Civic engagement among low‐income and low‐wealth families: In their words. Family relations, 55(2), 152-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00366.x
Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself?. Economica, 75(297), 39-59. DOI: doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00597.x
Mitra, A., & Verick, S. (2013). Youth employment and unemployment: an Indian Perspective. International Labour Organization Asia-Pacific Working Paper Series. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---sro-new_delhi/documents/publication/wcms_211552.pdf
Mitra, P. & Rajput, H., S. (2020). Initiative for What Works to Advance Women and Girls in the Economy. Women’s Workforce Participation in India: Statewide Trends. Available at: https://iwwage.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Bihar-Factsheet-upd.pdf
Murria, P., & Verma, S. (2013). Microfinance through Self-Help Groups: A Thematic Perspective. Productivity, 54(3).
Nexus Community Partners (2014). The Impacts of Community Engagement. Available at: https://nexuscp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Impacts-of-Community-Engagement.pdf
NITI Aayog (2021). India National Multidimensional Poverty Index: Baseline Report. NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi. Available at: https://ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/India_MPI_2021_REPORT.pdf
Nuñez-Alvarez, A., Clark-Ibáñez, M., Ardón, A. M., Ramos, A. L., & Pellicia, M. R. (2018). Cultivando respeto (cultivating respect): Engaging the Latino community. Metropolitan Universities, 29(2), 118-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/21758
Pande, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-9017-2
Pett, M., Lackey, N. & Sullivan, J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Saggurti, N., Atmavilas, Y., Porwa, lA., Schooley, J., Das, R., Kande, N.,et al. (2018) Effect of health intervention integration within women’s self help groups on collectivization and healthy practices around reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health in rural India. PLoSONE13(8): DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0202562
Sanyal, P., Rao, V., & Majumdar, S. (2015). Recasting culture to undo gender: A sociological analysis of Jeevika in Rural Bihar, India. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7411). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2661137
Srivastava, N., & Srivastava, R. (2010). Women, work, and employment outcomes in rural India. Economic and political weekly, 49-63. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40736730
Stirling, C. M., O'Meara, P., Pedler, D., Tourle, V. and Walker, J. 2007, Engaging rural communities in health care through a paramedic expanded scope of practice, Rural and remote health, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1-9. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30047407
Sindik, J. (2013). Simple robust method for quasi-confirmatory factor analysis (Three examples). Collegium antropologicum, 37(4), 1071-1080.
Tiwari, A. M., & Thakur, S. G. (2007). SHG-based microfinance programmes: can they remove poverty?. In Membership Based Organizations of the Poor (pp. 177-198). Routledge.
World Bank.(2012). When Do Participatory Development Projects Work? Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2012/11/14/when-do-participatory-development-projects-work
Wray-Lake, L., DeHaan, C. R., Shubert, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2), 79-94.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kirk Leach, Mirivel Julien, Tusty ten Bensel, Avinash Thombre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research / Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l'économie sociale [thereafter CJNSER] will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, and that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a not-for-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility. In keeping with this principle, the journal will publish all of its issues online.
Authors who publish in CJNSER agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
[Content published between 2010 and 2019-10 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA) License. Content published between 2019-10 to 2023-12 was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Content published after 2023-12 is licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 International (CC BY) License.]
