Room to Flourish: Lessons for Canadian Grantmaking Foundations from Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands

Authors

  • Nazita Lajevardi Uppsala University
  • Mirle Rabinowitz Bussell UCSD
  • James Stauch Mount Royal
  • Nicole Rigillo McGill University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2017v8n2a256

Keywords:

Grantmaking foundations, Philanthropic foundations, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands, International comparisons, Social origins theory / Fondations subventionnaires, Fondations philanthropiques, Suède, Allemagne, Pays-Bas, Comparaisons internationales,

Abstract

While Canada has experienced a long and successful history of encouraging social participation and community activity through its grantmaking foundation sector, this article argues that Canada’s historic and present-day regulatory restrictions have limited the extent to which its foundation sector has been allowed to innovate and flourish. To exemplify the types of tractable regulatory schemes that have allowed grantmaking foundation sectors in comparative contexts to prosper, the evolution of the grantmaking foundation sectors in Sweden, Germany, and the Netherlands is examined within the context of social origins theory. One important contribution of this article is to compare their regulatory frameworks to the Canadian context. It concludes with lessons learned for the Canadian grantmaking foundation sector and for public officials to consider.

Bien que le secteur des fondations subventionnaires au Canada ait connu une longue histoire de réussites dans l’encouragement de la participation sociale et de l’activité communautaire, cet article soutient qu’une réglementation restrictive autant dans le passé qu’au présent a limité l’innovation et l’épanouissement dans le secteur. Afin de montrer comment une réglementation plus souple pourrait permettre aux fondations canadiennes de prospérer davantage, cet article recourt à la théorie des origines sociales pour examiner le secteur en Suède, en Allemagne et aux Pays-Bas. Une contribution importante de cet article consiste ainsi à comparer les contextes réglementaires dans ces pays à celui du Canada. En conclusion, il fait des recommandations pour les fondations subventionnaires et le secteur public canadiens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nazita Lajevardi, Uppsala University

Nazita Lajevardi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Uppsala University in the Department of Government. She works on issues of race, representation, inequality, and advocacy.

References

Anheier, H. K. (2001). Foundations in Europe: A comparative perspective. Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and Political Science.

Anheier, H. K., & Hoelscher, M. (2015). 1 Cultural sustainability in small and medium-sized cities. Culture and Sustainability in European Cities: Imagining Europolis, 17.

Burger, A., & Dekker, P. (2001). The nonprofit sector in the Netherlands.

Carlsson, Fredrik & Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Martinsson, Peter, 2003. "Do You Enjoy Having More Than Others? Survey Evidence of Positional Goods," Working Papers in Economics 100, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.

Daalder, H. (1984). In search of the center of European party systems. American Political Science Review, 78(01), 92-109.

Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of democratic systems. Comparative political studies, 1(1), 3-44.

Lundström, T., & Wijkström, F. (1997). The nonprofit sector in Sweden. Manchester University Press.

McGann, J. G., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Comparative think tanks, politics and public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Monitor Institute (2014). What’s Next for Community Philanthropy. Retrieved from, http://monitorinstitute.com/communityphilanthropy/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/HowPhilanthropyIsChanging.pdf.

Moreno, Esperanza, and Betty Plewes. “Thinking Globally? Canadian Foundations and Trends in International Philanthropy.” The Philanthropist 21, no. 2 (2009): 151–68.

Pearson, Hilary, and Patten, Monica. “Canada.” In Global Institutional Philanthropy: A Preliminary Status Report Part II: Country Profiles, WINGS Global Institutional Philanthropy: Country Reports. TPI/WINGS Publication, 2010.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The american prospect, 4(13), 35-42.

Salamon, Lester M., and Helmut K. Anheier. "Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally." Voluntas: International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations 9.3 (1998): 213-248.

Veldheer, V., & Burger, A. (1999). History of the Nonprofit Sector in the Netherlands. Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.

Wijkström, F., & Einarsson, S. (2004). Foundations in Sweden: their scope, roles and visions. Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics [Ekonomiska forskningsinstitutet vid Handelshögskolan](EFI).

Zimmer, A., & Bräuer, S. (2014). The Development of Social Entrepreneurs in Germany. Münster: Institut für Politikwissenschaften.

Zimmer, A., Appel, A., Dittrich, C., Lange, C., Sittermann, B., Stallmann, F., & Kendall, J. (2005). The Third Sector and the Policy Process in Germany. Third sector european policy w

Downloads

Published

2018-01-31